sanpaku_backup: (Default)
[personal profile] sanpaku_backup
This is my third trip through the greater New York area in the last three weeks... and I have another in two weeks, and another a week and a half after that.

It is not that bad -- kind of a three hour long subway ride, with the Acela -- but every time I need a couple of days to recover from things I couldn't accomplish because I was traveling.

I am getting quite familiar with life at the Hudson, where I am now. For example, two weeks ago I discovered that there was awful static electricity here. I had to touch all the doorknobs as I walked down the hall. ("Hey, looks like you have OCD," said D.) Now I figured out that I just need to roll my suitcase down the hall every time I go out, and there's much less pain at the end of things.

-----------------

For no apparent reason, some notes on televised culture that I've been thinking about:

- MST3K is finally off the air. This is depressing, but for the past year or so I have been busy Saturday mornings at 9 anyway. Still, it felt good that somewhere, people were watching the show. One thing that's good is that "Touch of Satan" will finally come out on DVD.

- Big blowout on The Wire tomorrow -- last two episodes. They are making another season, apparently, so I have that to look forward to. Another show that's coming out on DVD. (The Wire is so much better than The Sopranos, it's amazing. Especially the last couple years of the Sopranos, which have stunk, imho.)

- AbFab seems to be done as well, though we should consider ourselves lucky that they made another season after all this time, and miraculously, it is still as good as ever

- For no apparent reason we now get the Boomerang channel on the cable modem package. This is a network entirely devoted to old Hanna-Barbera cartoons. Not the Flintstones and the Jetsons, but the really awful cartoons, like Josie and the Pussycats. The stuff that an entire generation has learned to mock via late Sunday nights on the Cartoon Network. Why there's a huge demand for it, I don't know. Josie and the Pussycats makes Scooby-Doo look like Moliere.

It was bad enough when people started reliving 1980s music. Now this. Complete infantile regression underway. And you know it has to aimed at my generation. The kids today wouldn't watch shit like that for ten seconds.

-----------------

One of the students in my class is a woman in her 70s. She is very talkative and opinionated and is interested in asking my impression of things beyond the class. During the break she asked me about a remark I had made about The Passion Fruit, about Mel's wacky pre-Vatican II theology.

It was true. The movie doesn't exactly have pre-Vatican II theology. But Mel has plenty of it. She just flatly denied that the movie was anti-Semitic. I told her that when you decide to focus on the aspects of the story that he did, and make Pontius Pilate the hero and so forth, you're making creative decisions about what's important in that story. And it's not as though we need to wonder what people make of presenting the story that way. She asked me, "oh, so we should sanitize it?" Well, that wasn't going anywhere.

But it made me think again how, deep down, I am a believer in repression. Self-repression, to be responsible. I mean, you don't have to think that everyone who sees Birth of a Nation will kill black people to be wary of that movie. All that matters is that some people will feel that way. Josef Goebbels would have understood this movie instantly. But no, let's pretend otherwise. What a pretty picture! How aesthetically interesting! And so on.

You cannot tell me that someone watching a person turned into a plate of human spaghetti for two hours won't leave without being profoundly pissed off. And with this particular story, it's not as though we need to speculate. Easter time was always the time when "love" for the Jews of Russia was expressed in its greatest degree. And we have the whole of the twentieth century to tell us what happens when bad ideas meet mass culture.

The quotation from my mother in law: "You leave without any question that it was the Jews." Remains to be determined whether that is something that bothered her.

Date: 2004-03-04 07:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] millarose.livejournal.com
hi ... i read a great editorial in the Chicago Tribune by the head of a major seminary. (may have saved it but have to check). She wrote that the film is inaccurate on several levels. Most interestingly, she said that it was definitively the Romans who killed Christ, because crucifixion was their traditional method of capital punishment, whereas for the Israelites/Canaanites (whateva'), stoning was the primary method. Put differently, Jews would never be caught near a cross. Also, what beef would we have against Christ? In our liturgy, we never tried to convert other groups -- why would we try to somehow "convert back" Jesus, whatever that would mean?

Just some food for thought :-)

It was true. The movie doesn't exactly have pre-Vatican II theology. But Mel has plenty of it. She just flatly denied that the movie was anti-Semitic. I told her that when you decide to focus on the aspects of the story that he did, and make Pontius Pilate the hero and so forth, you're making creative decisions about what's important in that story. And it's not as though we need to wonder what people make of presenting the story that way. She asked me, "oh, so we should sanitize it?" Well, that wasn't going anywhere.

Date: 2004-03-05 11:14 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sanpaku.livejournal.com
There's no question that there are many basic problems of historical accuracy in the Gospels. For one, yes, crucifixion was a Roman punishment. For another, the Sanhedrin did not have the power to condemn people in Roman times, and according to the historical record, capital punishment hardly ever happened. For another, the Gospel has the Sanhedrin sentencing Jesus to death on Passover, which also would never happen because Jewish law prevents judgements from being made on holidays.

The whole Gospel story is extremely suspect and was almost certainly altered over time to be more anti-Jewish, once it was clear that Jews were not going over to the new faith. Mohammed and Luther had similar reactions over time.

But this woman was not going to discuss the reality of what she called "the simple, historical truth" with me, and it's true, I'm not going to get into it with a True Believer.

Date: 2004-03-05 09:21 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] msmidge.livejournal.com
There are tons of historical & gospel accuracy problems with The Passion...last fall I read an article, I think in The New Republic, documenting all the issues that the New Testament scholars had with it that they brought to the producers of the movie (wrong languages--should have used Greek instead of Latin--for starters). The producers told them to f*ck off, and then started spreading rumors that the scholars had stolen the script in order to defame Mel Gibson. Uh...right. New Testament professors have nothing better to do than conspire against Mel Gibson.

I haven't seen the movie--have you?--and I don't really plan to unless it comes on TV or something. But one of my professors (a Christian ethics scholar) saw it and discussed it with a group of students last week, though, and he said that while he didn't find the movie intentionally antisemitic, he did see how it could easily feed existing antisemitic feelings that viewers might have. This is one of the lines of thought I've heard from others too--maybe NYT op-ed writers or something. He also said that he thought the movie wasn't trying to spread any kind of peace or harmony--that people were meant to leave the movie angry about what had happened to Jesus. And the violence of the movie was apparently hard to believe in-- that "Jesus" could remain conscious after the severity of the beatings he's subjected to. And then Satan appears in there--where in the gospels is Satan present in the Passion story? Nowhere. It really irritates me that this movie is being promoted as historically and textually true and realistic when this is in NO WAY the case. Argh.

That's all I have to say about it. Really. :)

Date: 2004-03-05 11:17 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sanpaku.livejournal.com
Dammit, I wish I had mentioned the Latin issue, because there's a great example of Mel changing the story... and doing so in order to push a pre-Vatican II agenda (restoring Latin to the mass). The Satan thing is a good point too.

It has been so much discussed all over the place. But the people I trust on movies have described it as excruciating, really almost pornographic. I don't need to see that, and I don't need to spend my money to benefit Holocaust-denying hatemongers, either.

Date: 2004-03-05 08:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] msmidge.livejournal.com
Yeah, that's my feeling exactly. [livejournal.com profile] laurens10 linked to the site of the Catholic breakaway group that Mel's father belongs to, and they have a lovely piece on there about the Jews trying to destroy Christianity, so the Christians need to watch out for that and all.

May 2022

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 23rd, 2026 08:23 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios